<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Harper&#8217;s new Senate appointments disappoint</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.camillelabchuk.ca/2009/08/27/harpers-new-senate-appointments-disappoint/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.camillelabchuk.ca/2009/08/27/harpers-new-senate-appointments-disappoint/</link>
	<description>Green Party federal councilor. Vegan for life. Political junkie. Law student.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 Sep 2010 18:52:30 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Kathy Acheson</title>
		<link>http://www.camillelabchuk.ca/2009/08/27/harpers-new-senate-appointments-disappoint/comment-page-1/#comment-104</link>
		<dc:creator>Kathy Acheson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Aug 2009 13:36:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.camillelabchuk.ca/?p=159#comment-104</guid>
		<description>The sickest part of all this is that Harper appointed the Senators who would uphold &quot;the elected government&quot; of Canada. Which government was that? We elect MPs, they form a government. If we did &quot;elect&quot; the Conservatives, we did it at a rate of 37 for every 100 voters. If the Senate is to reflect voters&#039; interests, then there should be 6 Green Senators for every 100 of them. 

Then this morning I heard Linda Frum interviewed on cbc radio. She said that a Senator is &quot;beholden&quot; to whomsoever appoints her, and should vote in favour of their legislation, whatever personal opinions or views she has. So much for the chamber of sober second thought, and so much for democracy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The sickest part of all this is that Harper appointed the Senators who would uphold &#8220;the elected government&#8221; of Canada. Which government was that? We elect MPs, they form a government. If we did &#8220;elect&#8221; the Conservatives, we did it at a rate of 37 for every 100 voters. If the Senate is to reflect voters&#8217; interests, then there should be 6 Green Senators for every 100 of them. </p>
<p>Then this morning I heard Linda Frum interviewed on cbc radio. She said that a Senator is &#8220;beholden&#8221; to whomsoever appoints her, and should vote in favour of their legislation, whatever personal opinions or views she has. So much for the chamber of sober second thought, and so much for democracy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lilian Nattel</title>
		<link>http://www.camillelabchuk.ca/2009/08/27/harpers-new-senate-appointments-disappoint/comment-page-1/#comment-103</link>
		<dc:creator>Lilian Nattel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Aug 2009 01:09:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.camillelabchuk.ca/?p=159#comment-103</guid>
		<description>This is the downside of senators for life. We&#039;re stuck with the scary bunch.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is the downside of senators for life. We&#8217;re stuck with the scary bunch.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Silent Majority</title>
		<link>http://www.camillelabchuk.ca/2009/08/27/harpers-new-senate-appointments-disappoint/comment-page-1/#comment-102</link>
		<dc:creator>The Silent Majority</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Aug 2009 23:21:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.camillelabchuk.ca/?p=159#comment-102</guid>
		<description>Well, given that Harper&#039;s partisan appointments were largely prompted by Elizabeth May&#039;s musings last fall, I don&#039;t really think you&#039;re in a position to criticise.

I&#039;m not sure the general public would find her appointment less offensive than this set.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, given that Harper&#8217;s partisan appointments were largely prompted by Elizabeth May&#8217;s musings last fall, I don&#8217;t really think you&#8217;re in a position to criticise.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m not sure the general public would find her appointment less offensive than this set.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
