<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Monday Mag agrees: Hetherington drives down level of discourse in SGI</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.camillelabchuk.ca/2009/10/02/monday-mag-agrees-hetherington-drives-down-level-of-discourse-in-sgi/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.camillelabchuk.ca/2009/10/02/monday-mag-agrees-hetherington-drives-down-level-of-discourse-in-sgi/</link>
	<description>Green Party federal councilor. Vegan for life. Political junkie. Law student.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 Sep 2010 18:52:30 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Erich Jacoby-Hawkins</title>
		<link>http://www.camillelabchuk.ca/2009/10/02/monday-mag-agrees-hetherington-drives-down-level-of-discourse-in-sgi/comment-page-1/#comment-460</link>
		<dc:creator>Erich Jacoby-Hawkins</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Oct 2009 08:01:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.camillelabchuk.ca/?p=306#comment-460</guid>
		<description>SM - &quot;she loses&quot;? May won the nomination, in case you missed it. If it was a contest between the number of Liberal members or GPC members in SGI, then that&#039;s not a fight she was going to win so shortly after picking the riding, so I don&#039;t see the point in using that as a yardstick.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>SM &#8211; &#8220;she loses&#8221;? May won the nomination, in case you missed it. If it was a contest between the number of Liberal members or GPC members in SGI, then that&#8217;s not a fight she was going to win so shortly after picking the riding, so I don&#8217;t see the point in using that as a yardstick.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Silent Majority</title>
		<link>http://www.camillelabchuk.ca/2009/10/02/monday-mag-agrees-hetherington-drives-down-level-of-discourse-in-sgi/comment-page-1/#comment-442</link>
		<dc:creator>The Silent Majority</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Oct 2009 18:52:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.camillelabchuk.ca/?p=306#comment-442</guid>
		<description>Angus Reid latest poll results,  Friday, October 2, 2009:

British Columbia

Conservatives: 42 (+5)
Liberals: 23 (-6)
NDP: 28 (+12)
&lt;b&gt;Green:7 (-1)&lt;/b&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Angus Reid latest poll results,  Friday, October 2, 2009:</p>
<p>British Columbia</p>
<p>Conservatives: 42 (+5)<br />
Liberals: 23 (-6)<br />
NDP: 28 (+12)<br />
<b>Green:7 (-1)</b></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave Bagler</title>
		<link>http://www.camillelabchuk.ca/2009/10/02/monday-mag-agrees-hetherington-drives-down-level-of-discourse-in-sgi/comment-page-1/#comment-441</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave Bagler</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Oct 2009 18:29:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.camillelabchuk.ca/?p=306#comment-441</guid>
		<description>Hey Camille,
Thanks for posting this (and your last post)!  Also don&#039;t worry about The Silent Majority as they are clearly a noisy minority and an ass too cowardly to use their own name.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Camille,<br />
Thanks for posting this (and your last post)!  Also don&#8217;t worry about The Silent Majority as they are clearly a noisy minority and an ass too cowardly to use their own name.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Silent Majority</title>
		<link>http://www.camillelabchuk.ca/2009/10/02/monday-mag-agrees-hetherington-drives-down-level-of-discourse-in-sgi/comment-page-1/#comment-440</link>
		<dc:creator>The Silent Majority</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Oct 2009 17:09:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.camillelabchuk.ca/?p=306#comment-440</guid>
		<description>Nice spin, Camille. It goes on to say: &quot;But May says the small voter turnout reflects only the fact the Green meeting had to compete with the beloved Salt Spring Island Fall Fair, where most of the riding&#039;s 250-or-so card-carrying party members live.&quot;

So, with the planet at risk, the importance of getting E May elected, she loses because of the TWO DAY Salt Spring Fair? As the churchlady used to say &#039;How convenient!&quot; And &quot;250 or-so card-carrying members&quot;? I thought I read it was around 100 somewhere, with maybe 50 expired. Hmmm. Are we being honest here?

Yes, &quot;the level of discourse is already descending to the depths Canadians have come to expect from our politicians&quot;, including yours.

(And what&#039;s the chance that the Monday Mag has green members? Pretty high, I&#039;d say)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice spin, Camille. It goes on to say: &#8220;But May says the small voter turnout reflects only the fact the Green meeting had to compete with the beloved Salt Spring Island Fall Fair, where most of the riding&#8217;s 250-or-so card-carrying party members live.&#8221;</p>
<p>So, with the planet at risk, the importance of getting E May elected, she loses because of the TWO DAY Salt Spring Fair? As the churchlady used to say &#8216;How convenient!&#8221; And &#8220;250 or-so card-carrying members&#8221;? I thought I read it was around 100 somewhere, with maybe 50 expired. Hmmm. Are we being honest here?</p>
<p>Yes, &#8220;the level of discourse is already descending to the depths Canadians have come to expect from our politicians&#8221;, including yours.</p>
<p>(And what&#8217;s the chance that the Monday Mag has green members? Pretty high, I&#8217;d say)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
